Nebraska has 3 congressional districts. We’ve generated 5,000 sets of randomly simulated districts according to the relevant criteria. Three of these plans are shown here, along with the actual enacted map.
In Nebraska, Democrats win about 37% of the vote in a typical statewide election. Proportionally, that would translate to 1.1 Democratic seats out of 3 total.
But proportionality isn’t guaranteed, even in a fair redistricting process. In our simulated plans, Democrats won anywhere from 0.2 to 0.8 seats on average, with 0.5 being the most typical. In contrast, we expect the enacted plan to yield 0.5 Democratic seats on average, which is more than 78% of all simulated plans.
The graph below breaks this down in detail, showing how each district of the enacted plan compares to the set of simulated districts.
There are other ways of measuring the partisan skew of redistricting plan. The graph below shows two these metrics. The deviation from partisan symmetry measures the expected difference in each party’s share of seats if they each won 50% of the statewide vote. The efficiency gap is calculated as the difference in the number of wasted votes for each party.
Learn more about these metrics here.
Factors other than partisanship are important for redistricting, too. The graph below shows the geographic compactness and the number of counties which are split into multiple districts. As far as compactness, Nebraska’s enacted plan scores a 0.31, less than 88% of all simulated plans (a higher score means more compact). It splits 2 counties, compared to an average of 2 counties for our simulated plans.
These two maps show the partisan lean across Nebraska in a typical statewide election, and the share of minority voters around the state.
Download the data for Nebraska.
Learn more about our methodology.
In Nebraska, districts must, under a legislative resolution:
If you see mistakes or want to suggest changes, please create an issue on the source repository.